APPLICATIONS


Analysis of Recurrent Genomic Amplifications in Breast Tumors

Nicholas Navin, Jim Hicks, Evan Leibu, Vladimir Grubor, Michael Riggs, Jennifer Troge, Susanne Maner, Par Lundin, Anders Zetterberg and Michael Wigler

In order to determine the amplitude of signal and specificity of the probes created with PROBER, we tiled 18 genomic regions that were identified by Representational Oligonucleotide Microarray Analysis (ROMA) in an ongoing study of breast tumors. For each locus, a mixture of 20-40 amplified TOPs were labeled with a single (desperate) fluorophore. Probes were generated to target specific 50-100kb regions of chromosome 11 that were identified as being recurrently amplified in breast cancer tumor cells.  Here we discuss the results of two probes that were designed to target specific amplifications (11-PROBE-Q4 and 11-PROBE-Q7) and two control probes that were designed to target hemizygous and diploid regions of chromosome 11 (11-PROBE-Q3 and 11-PROBE-Q6) by FISH.

For each FISH probe 20-40 TOPs were amplified by PCR from a genomic DNA template. The probes amplified with a high success rate (81.89% mean - circa 32/40 probes) suggesting that the algorithm and parameters for selecting probes by PROBER were sufficiently stringent. Moreover, only a single PCR product was observed for each PCR reactions, indicating that the primer selection algorithm identified unique primers that were specific in amplifying only a single target sequence.

In each FISH preparation a locus specific probe cocktail was prepared by mixing the PCR probes together and labelling each mixture with a distinct fluorophore.  In this experiment the mixture of 11-PROBE-Q4 TOPs were labelled with Cy3 and the control probe at 11-PROBE-Q3 was labelled with Texas Red.

Two probes were used for co-hybridization to nuclei immobilized on a slide.
The copy number quantified by ROMA showed a high correlation (R = 0.9814)with the mean copy number actually observed in each tumor sample by interphase FISH . Furthermore the FISH analysis provided distinct, round spots for each locus with a high signal:background ratio, as measured by Zeiss Axiovision software in 25-40 focal planes using a Zeiss fluorescent microscope.

Frozen breast cancer tumor cells from biopsies were cohybridized with TOP probes for either 11-PROBE-Q3+11-PROBE-Q4 or for 11-PROBE-Q7+11-PROBE-Q6. Breast cancer tumor cells that were detected by ROMA to have a copy number of 1 (hemizygous) for the 11Q6 probe, also showed a single fluorescent probe by FISH when labeled with Texas red. Tumor cells that were detected by ROMA to have a 100kb region of chromosome 11 amplified to 4 copies showed 4 copies when hybridized with the 11-PROBE-Q7 FISH probe. Furthermore, the FISH probes reveal that the amplification is occuring mainly on a single chromosome, and not on the other.  The other chromosome shows only a single fluorescent signal for both the control probe (11-PROBE-Q6) and the probe that was designed to target the amplicon (11-PROBE-Q7). The tumor cells were stained with DAPI (blue) to determine the boundary of the nucleus. The copy number of each genomic region was determined by analyzing the mean copy number of 25-40 focal plane slices of single cell. Finally the mean copy number for the tumor sample was determined by observing multiple (10-20) cells within the tumor sample.

The breast tumor cells that were hybridized with a control probe (11-PROBE-Q3) to target a region of chromosome 11 that was identified as having diploid copy number by ROMA also showed 2 copies when hybridized with PROBER FISH probes.  The FISH probe that targeted an amplicon on chromosome 11-PROBE-Q4, that was determined to have 4 copies by ROMA also showed 4 fluorescent signals by FISH analysis in a collection of frozen breast tumor cells. The amplification at 11Q4 was observed to occur primarily on one chromosome and not the other by FISH.  Furthermore, the 11-PROBE-Q4 amplification appears to have many smaller fragmented regions that were not amplified in discreet copy numbers.


In conclusion, Tiling Oligonucleotide Probes (TOPs) that are designed with PROBER can reveal precise genomic copy number amplifications and deletions that occur in frozen tumor cells.  Hydridizing specific probes that target 50-100kb regions in breast cancer not only provides very accurate information about copy number, but also provides information on the spatial distribution and chromosomal localization of amplifications. Additionally, FISH analysis using TOPs can determine if an amplification as small as a single gene is homogenous or heterogenous in a tumor cell population.  


Table 1 - Correlation of ROMA copy number and PROBER FISH probe copy number

Probe Target Genomic Region Mean ROMA Copy Number Mean FISH Probe Copy Number
11-PROBE-P1 chr11:48100000-48150000
2
2
11-PROBE-P2 chr11:49100000-49200000
2
2
11-PROBE-Q1 chr11:63000000-63050000
1
1
11-PROBE-Q2 chr11:69659081-69753184
3
3
11-PROBE-Q3 chr11:71985480-72068200
2
2
11-PROBE-Q3a chr11:74535017-74622468
2
2
11-PROBE-Q4 chr11:77614887-77718183
4
4
11-PROBE-Q5 chr11:83070000-83170000
2
2
11-PROBE-Q6 chr11:83070000-83170000
1
1
11-PROBE-Q7 chr11:84900000-85000000
4
4
11-PROBE-Q8 chr11:88200000-88300000
1
1
11-PROBE-Q9 chr11:90050000-90150000
5
5
11-PROBE-Q10 chr11:90550000-90650000
1
na
11-PROBE-Q11 chr11:99900000-100000000
6
6
11-PROBE-Q12 chr11:100950000-101050000
3
2
11-PROBE-Q13 chr11:102830000-102930000
3
2
11-PROBE-Q14 chr11:105820000-105920000
6
6
11-PROBE-Q15 chr11:125520000-125620000
1
1

Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) = 0.981483745


Below is normal diploid fibroblast cell that was hybridized with control FISH probes to illustrate normal diploid copy number in contrast to the amplifications that were observed in the 11Q3a and 11Q7 probes.